New technology such as wi-fi connections devices are currently at the center of both scrutiny and fascination. As TCL S720cellphone subscriptions continue to rise, questions are raised about the consequences of these new connections technology. How do these technology modify individuals and their community relations? Some have suggested that cellular phones‘affect every aspect of our individual and professional lives either directly or indirectly’ (Katz and Aakhus, 2002: i).

While important analysis has been done on looking into the consequences of ONEPLUS ONE mobile phones, one should not overestimate the consequences of new technology (Katz and Aakhus, 2002). Rather than follow a technical deterministic analysis agenda, Williams (1990) indicates knowing the societal perspective in which a technology is produced as a means of knowing its function in community as well as its reflection of community . By focusing only on the consequences of technology one can misunderstand the higher community and social perspective that it reflects.

Much analysis has examined how connections technology reflect the community and social world in which they are situated. Fischer (1992), Hopper (1992), Katz (1999), Pool (1977), Sarch (1993) and Umble (1996) all offer interesting examinations of the community uses and results of the cellphone. This analysis provides a great jumping-off point for examining cellphone usage. In Marvin’ s (1988) analysis about the release of electricity and the cellphone in the late Nineteenth century , she claims that communities use new technology to try and solve old problems of managing time and space in communicative relationships. In that process, users of new technology modify customary community distances among citizens. To manage the anxieties that result from these shifts, they must invent new conventions of community trust appropriate to these new technology. Similarly , Zuboff (1984) indicates that technologies do not lead to discrete results, but instead change the community and organizational fabric of our world. The results of new technology are not direct, but negotiated through people’ s construction and use of them.

This research aims to build on this body of literature by showing that new media, in particularly TCL S720 mobile phones, are quickly surrounded by common community guidelines and dilemmas. New technology offer a new position for individuals to work out these problems and socialize in ways with which they are already familiar. Over time, these communications create a whole new community scenery. Therefore, moreover to analysis on new technology, one can look to analysis on community connections to comprehend how individuals use ONEPLUS ONE mobile phones. Researchers such as Goffman (1963, 1971), Grice (1972), Hopper (1981, 1992), Maynard and Zimmerman (1984), Shimanoff (1980) and Sudnow (1972), offer analyses for the way in which individuals interact and behave in community situations. This research applies specifically Goffman’ s (1963) and Hopper’s (1992) work on normative roles for community connections to cellphone use in order to gain a higher knowing of this new community scenery arising in a wi-fi era.

Goffman and Hopper each provides us nuanced understandings of standards for community connections that are applicable to this research . To help make sense of how wi-fi technology might modify community connections in community areas, first one must comprehend community communications in community areas before the release of such technology . Goffman’ s (1963) observations of actions in community areas offer ideas into the standards for community connections. Specifically , he provides designs for normative actions in community areas. Goffman’ s ideas offer a position to start from which to discover the community uses and results of TCL S720 mobile phones in community.

While Goffman provides designs for normative actions in community space, Hopper (1992) indicates tacit community guidelines for conventional cellphone use. Using Hopper’ s designs of normative actions for cellphone conversations as a base, one can discover what happens when mobile phones are no longer as geographically confined to private areas. Hopper provides a position to start from which to analyze cellphone use in community areas. Together, Goffman and Hopper offer designs for knowing the release of ONEPLUS ONE mobile phones into community areas – specifically , how the technology may influence normative community connections, as well as how conventional landline cellphone use may modify when mobile phones can be used in more community situations.

Others have offered ideas into the uses and results of new wi-fi connections technology. In his book Machines that Become Us: The Social Context of Personal Communication Technology (2003), James Katz and others discover the relationship between individual connections technology and community control, suggesting that there is a complex interplay between style, the body , community groups and such technology (see also Katz and Aakhus, 2002). Katz claims that the fear of technology taking over community is ultimately misplaced and such beliefs neglect the human agency involved in using individual connections technology. In inclusion, Mizuko Ito’s analysis on Japanese individuals youngsters and cellular technology has broadened and deepened our knowing of the social and community uses of TCL S720mobile phones. She has discussed cellular technology as it relates to style, liberation from parental control and community organization for Japanese individuals teenagers (2003a, 2003b). As a social anthropologist, Ito’ s ethnographic methodological approach helps to contextualize her findings within Japanese individuals youngsters culture.